superstacker wrote:"You are to stay at the front door and make no arrests"
Guy sounds like an ass. Tells me everything I need to know about him and his "security" operation. I know that work is work mate, but I would have been looking elsewhere at that point. If he is going to be like that about the job role, how is he going to be about other issues you might have?
Its all because of money grabbing lawyers mate.
You stop someone you know is knicking, a serial offender, you have SCONE, but at some point they managed to get rid of the item without you seeing (despite your eyes never leaving them, for example the shop might be very busy at the time), so you stop them and they have nothing, then they get in touch with some dirty lawyer who helps them sue you / your company / the shop for false arrest, despite the fact you apologised for the "mistake" etc..
I was told at my company induction that a false arrest could cost ME not the company £15,000. It was like they were trying to scare us into NOT doing our job out of fear of this.
I am determined to do the best job I can do, without risking false arrest claims against me.
Something else you need to realise is that uniformed security roles (which the role in question originally was) is 99% about providing a visual deterrent, to put kids etc... off knicking because they know theres somebody stood at the door who might stop them (if another member of staff is onto them knicking).
Now irish has gone and spoken to the manager of the store about the REAL problems which need addressing and suggested ways he can help. The manager agrees with him and does not seem to want just someone at the door because that has not worked in the past for them, and it seems that the security contractor who is hiring irish sensed he was about to lose irish (a good experienced operator) and possibly lose his contract with the store in question, so he has agreed to do what irish and the manager think best.